Audio Calibration

Now that a proper TV stand is in place, I thought it time to revisit the audio setup.  I say this because the stand slightly modified the arrangement of some speakers, and music sounded just different enough that I couldn’t let it go.  So when the girls went out grocery shopping, I used the rare moment of silence to begin a calibration.

In theory, the measurable amplitudes of a sampling of sine waves across the spectrum of 20Hz to 20kHz should register a similar decibel score.  In practice, the physical limitations of speaker drivers prevents this, but settings can be tweaked to reduce the disparity.  I lack any sort of professional calibration equipment, but in reality a good sound setting is merely defined as preference by the listener, so I opted to use what I had on hand and simply settle for a mere approximation.

Judge me not for the assortment of bands in the background

iTunes has, through whatever typical obscure Apple methodology, determined the above frequencies to be focal points in the human range of hearing.  I’m sure there’s some kind of math behind it, but I didn’t care enough to research it.

So, I YouTubed each of these frequencies for a test tone, played the tone, then measured the decibel level with a free sound meter app on my phone.  I’m not sure how accurate this method was, but I aggregated the figures as guidelines (chasing the dogs out of the room in the process as they did not appreciate the test tones above 1kHz):

I noticed an amplitude dropoff at the high and low ranges, which I found satisfying in that I had already adjusted the levels to compensate, based on my hearing alone.  I made some minor adjustments.

So my hearing may be getting worse, but I can still identify amplitude variations across the audible spectrum.  At least now when I’m forced to watch M*A*S*H reruns, I can at better appreciate the audio balance.

–Simon

Yolk

As an evolved omnivore, I can extract nutrients from a variety of unsettling plant and animal products.  In fact, the ones I treasure the most–alcohol, cheese, butter–are kind of gross upon a deeper examination.  And the foodstuffs not ingrained in my own culture, the ones I find even more revolting, are equally edible…and generally presumed to be enhancers of male virility.  Erections from bird saliva–who would have thought?

And to further push the boundaries of making this blog no longer family-friendly, let us consider the humble egg.  That’s right, a chicken gamete.  I often don’t consider the biology behind the food I consume, but one day I cracked and egg and into the pan fell the bloody indications of fertilization–I suppose that made it a zygote, for it not yet bore any indication of embryonic status.

Repulsed, I hesitated, for how often does one find a fertilized chicken egg in their soon-to-be omelet?  Squander not an opportunity I say.  And I knew intrinsically, probably from some long-forgotten documentary, that such an egg was indeed “a delicacy”.  At the worst, it wouldn’t kill me.  So, I cooked it and bit into it with determined curiosity, then promptly expectorated my sample into the sink.  It tasted, unsurprisingly, of a bloody egg.  Yuck.

I tell this story as a preface to another.  This last weekend I cracked an egg (for the former experience was insufficient to turn me off eggs forever), and was pleasantly surprised with a new kind of novelty: a double yolk:

I suppose this means that a chicken could, in theory, have twin offspring.  Naturally I took to Google to find evidence, but while the anecdotal postings confirmed the theory, they revoked the practice.  Apparently two chicks can develop in an egg, but ultimately complications arise which doom the progeny.

Pity.  I winced once again at the over-analysis of what I was eating, then added salt.

–Simon

Mr. Once-Ler

The Christmas tree is down.

I spoke previously of the cursed tree that wouldn’t hold ornaments and gave me hives.  We’ve since blamed it for a shared allergy-turned-sinus-infection that’s turned the house into a mass of hacking, spitting, and overall generally miserable group of barely-animate skulking human flesh.  So after Liz packed up the ornaments and I the lights, I decided upon a solution more efficient than lugging the thing through the house once more.  I would take my revenge upon the arboreal abomination and in the process use a power tool.  How manly is that combo: violent revenge and power tools? …even if it was the reciprocating saw– AKA the small penis saw aforementioned.

Mua HAHAHAHAHA!
And out the window
Even with the wider hose, the needles clogged up the new shop vac too
Someone got yelled at for getting in the way

I plan to institute a new holiday: Christmas Tree Burning Day.  It will be held on the first weekend day that it isn’t unbearably cold.  I find that appropriate, seeing as the tree itself is a take on the pagan yule log thing (and it totally is, despite having heard ex post facto attempts to explain the tree’s origins in Christianity).

Arbor Ignis!

–Simon

Ephemerality

I registered a domain for this blog–not for any important reason other than it was available: ephemerality.net; and since domain names only become increasingly more rare, I was pleased to see that a single word–the titular word of this blog–was available.  I hadn’t even thought to check its availability until now, assuming it had been taken.

Although .com certainly was taken, by a squatter.  As in, it’s registered but no active site exists at that location, so it must be some guy who thought he’d hang onto it and wait for some company to offer him a big payout for it some day.  But visiting the URL brings up a 404 error, so it’s routing traffic somewhere, just not somewhere with an HTTP site.  Maybe he’s using it as a placeholder to a private server.  Dunno.

In any case, I now own the .net version, which redirects here anyway so nothing amazing going on.  At least it’s shorter to type.

–Simon

Sidecar

“I need a pretentious cocktail to order.”

The request immediately snapped me from my daydreams.

For reasons I won’t go into here, we were headed to a social function.  And Liz wanted to send the appropriate social cue: engaged, but slightly and arrogantly aloof (see above: pretentious).  Not negatively and actively pretentious, but rather one of perceived pretentiousness, as in: I dressed up to go out and I speak with proper grammar.  That kind of pretentiousness–the kind that would complement her husband’s trenchcoat/tie/scarf-wearing pretentiousness.  You get the idea.

Mix pretentiousness with drinking, and in this very specific scenario, she was married to the right man.

“Ah, well then you need an obscure yet classic cocktail,” I replied, then began thinking.  It had to be something she would drink, obviously, yet it had to be something I’d never seen on a menu before.  But, it had to be rooted in old traditions–a recipe that had an official IBA standing and contested origination history.  A memory coalesced of Alton Brown (culinary pretentiousness personified), arguing his historical version of the margarita’s predecessor.  The associated visual he had provided was even in a Parisian cafe–or bar, whatever the French call those establishments.  It was a perfect backstory, if only I could remember what it was called.

I remember having had one before, though I didn’t remember when or where.  It had a dark spirit, and was sweet and citrus-y.  I lapsed into silence, waiting for the fragmented neurons to fire in the appropriate sequence.  Minutes passed since my response; while I grumbled to myself, cursed my memory, and browsed through my phone hoping to find the answer.  Yet Liz didn’t interrupt my thoughts.  Perhaps the visual signals I was sending indicated a heavy CPU load, like a fervently-blinking yellow light–you just let it finish what it’s doing before trying something else or it might lock up and crash.

“A sidecar!”  Huzzah!  I then researched the exact ingredients: cognac, lemon juice, and an orange liqueur–which sounded good to Liz.  Then, to complete the effect, we discussed the manner in which such a drink had to be ordered: with a specified liqueur and manner of serving–ultimately concluded to be Grand Marnier and served up (and Courvoisier–if your preference is for that mediocre product of marketing other cognac that’s only drunk because of its popularity among hip-hop singers, kill yourself).

At the restaurant, the waitress took down the order with an obvious air of skepticism, probably assuming that someone at the bar had to know what it was.  She returned with a cocktail–served up and in the appropriate vessel…with a glass of something else alongside.  Upon inquiry, she explained that that was the Grand Marnier.  Apparently somewhere along the way someone considered the liqueur to be a separate request, rather than a preferred ingredient.  No matter, once the Grand Marnier was mixed in, it made for a very respectable sidecar.

Liz found it very agreeable to her palette, and decided to request the drink elsewhere, and each time it was a phenomenal success.  This made me re-think my own cocktail of choice, the Manhattan, because 1) Bourbon is increasing in popularity, and 2) Possibly as a result of the first reason, the Manhattan is now well known, which leads to 3) The drink appears on cocktail menus now which means that everyone makes their own non-standard version, they’re watered-down, and they’re overpriced.  My weak-ass Manhattan cost $10 next to Liz’s significantly stronger and tastier $7 sidecar.

So now I’m jealous.  We can’t both order the same drink, and the sidecar’s become her socially-refined signature cocktail.  Perhaps it’s time for me to just move on.  Bourbon, you were good to me for a long time, but you’re kind of a whore, and too many lips have touched you.

–Simon